|
|
| 
|
|

|
Home > Paper
> MISIE
English
Paper
|
|
|
|
|

|
|

|
|
CONTENTS
¥°. Introduction
¥±. Research
Methods 2 1.
Subject of Research 2.
Items and tools
of Measurement 3.
Methods of measurement 4.
Exercise Program 5.
Statistic Disposition
¥². Research
Results 5 1.
Body Size 2.
Body Composition
¥³. Discussion 8 1.
Body Size 2.
Body Composition
¥´. Conclusion
and Suggestion 11 1.
Body Size 2.
Body Composition
Related Reading
Materials
List of Tables ...Table
1. The physical
characteristics
of subjects ...Table
2. Test items and
measurement tools ...Table
3. Misie training
program for 8 weeks ...Table
4. The comparison
of physique ...Table
5. The comparison
of body composition
List
of Figure ...Fig.
1. Misie Product
|
|

|
|
¥°.
INTRODUCTION
¡®Set a Goal
for a Healthy Body
Mass¡¯ This is
the first guideline
from the most recent
publication of ADHHS¡¯s
(Americans Department
of Health and Human
Services) Dietary
Guidelines for Americans
(Heyward, 2002).
Obesity is not
only known as a
major health threat
but also a cause
for disease like
diabetes, high blood
pressure, a fat
of blood level,
and many others.
In the recent years,
the obese population
has rapidly increased
in advanced nations
as well as in developing
nations. According
to the National
Nutrition Survey,
the occurrence rate
of diseases in the
obese with more
than 25kg/m2
BMI(Body Mass Index)
rated 20.5% in 1995,
increased to 26.3%
in 1998, and pressing
onto 30% recently.
Other various survey
data also reports
an increase in the
occurrence rate
of obese-related
diseases, which
suggests at the
necessity to treat
obesity not only
as a beauty issue
but more so as a
threat to the national
health, not only
in Korea but in
other countries
as well. The recent
increase of GNP,
development of industry,
and westernization
of lifestyle has
led to excessive
nutrition intake
and lack of exercise,
which in turn instigated
obesity. Obesity
occurring in various
age groups has presented
itself as a serious
uprising problem
in the society because
of its contribution
in the cause of
many geriatric diseases
as well as a its
appeal as a beauty
dilemma. (C.I. Lee,
2002; Y.S. Yun,
2001).
Based on a person¡¯s
fat %, men with
+20% and women with
+30% are considered
overweight or obese.
These fat are usually
stored under the
tissue and around
the intestines (Rexrode
etc, 1997); and
for cure of such
obesity, dieting
and exercising methods
are used. Especially
in middle age women,
the body fat distribution
is concentrated
around upper body,
such as stomach,
back, etc., thus
rapidly forming
a pot belly, an
abdominal obesity;
it has been reported
that this contributes
to a decrease of
estrogen as well
as of other factors.
(Fukunaga etc, 1993).
In regards to
the recent increase
of obesity in women,
the Korea Obesity
Association claims
the 11.68% obesity
rate of women in
1995 will increase
to 26.52% in 1998,
and 32.24% in 2000;
and predicts a peak
of 35-40% in the
next 5 years (J.H.
Kang & N.S.
Kim, 2002). Obesity
sometimes occurs
during infancy;
most that occur
in the 40¡¯s, however,
contribute to the
cause of Breast
Cancer, Cervical
Cancer, and the
Ovarium Cancer (Y.S.
Yun, 2001).
Dieting
and exercising methods
have been emphasized
as a cure and prevention
for obesity because
the unbalanced energy
input and output
ratio serves as
the biggest factors
leading to causing
obesity. As a result,
methods of changing
lifestyles, such
as dieting and exercising
methods have become
standard cure for
obesity. Many other
methods have also
been introduced
such as medicament,
liposuction, and
aromatherapy (Y.S.
Yun, 2001). Of the
various exercises,
regular respiratory
exercises have proven
efficient, because
such exercises lead
to detailed
of cholesterol density
within the blood
and other related
positive alterations,
as a prevention
to obesity as well
as decreasing the
risk of coronary
artery disease (K.J.
Kim & W.K. Chun,
1999). Despite many
people¡¯s expectations
that exercising
will cure obesity,
they need to question
the efficiency of
such methods in
the low calorie
usage of the regular
exercises, difficulties
of exercising as
an obesity patients,
not used to regular
or vigorous exercise-only
which will burn
the large amount
of calories that
they wish to burn-,
and the possibility
of injuries during
exercising (Garrow,
1992). Through many
researches, it can
be claimed that
in cases where obesity
have been cured
only through exercising,
there was some weight
loss; however the
efficiency was not
great, and thus
it is highly recommended
that dieting methods
be used along side
with exercising
methods (Andersen
et al. 1999).
Exercising
is recommended as
the cure for obesity
not only because
calorie usage may
help lose weight
but also because
of the various setoffs
calorie usage may
have on different
parts of the body
(PerNjOrntorp, 2001).
Thus, the effects
exercising as a
cure to obesity
cannot beyond the
simple calorie usage;
the regular energy
usage helps accomplish
and maintain a healthy
body composition
(S.W. Oh, 2002),
promotion of fast
metabolism, and
maintaining weight
loss (Kayman etc,
1990), have an overall
positive effect
on one¡¯s healthiness
and is thus recommended.
Especially in middle
age women who are
full-time housewives,
their lack of free
time due to the
mass amount daily
housework and their
inability to attend
exercising or dieting
programs thus, for
the cure of obesity
has contributed
to the growing numbers.
Also even if they
participated in
an exercising program,
because of the possible
danger vigorous
activities may have
on their limbs,
especially middle
age body, their
reluctance becomes
even greater. Thus,
this research was
conducted recognizing
the housewives¡¯s
conditions, both
environmental and
physical, and the
need for a more
efficient home-style
weight loss method
rather than a vigorous
dieting program,
that demands neither
excessive extra
time or effort.
The Misie that
was used for this
research is belt-like
device of 6-7kg,
which helps reduce
appetite and lose
weight through weight
stimulation around
the abdominal area
through naturally
breathing with the
device placed on
one¡¯s stomach.
Although there are
no preceding researches
on the effects of
Misie, which use
the concept of abdominal
weight-lifting exercises,
it goes similar
to exercise of abdomen
through the muscle
resistance.
Human muscle
formations decrease
as their increases.
The degree of the
deterioration, however,
varies with each
individual; especially
for people who practice
appropriate nutrition
intake and regular
resistance exercises,
the changes are
minor. The decrease
of muscle formation
in women due to
age increase is
thus an outcome
brought by unhealthy
lifestyle, diet,
and exercising habits
rather than a natural
inevitability. Moritani
and deVries(1980),
research on women¡¯s
muscular strength
increase and ratios
in women who participated
in resistance exercises,
show that there
was an over 20%
increase in muscular
strength other
researches have
also proven that
resistance exercise
bring noticeable
increase in muscular
strength in women
(K.W. Kim &
Y.C. Yu 1998).
In conclusion,
it has been assumed
that through regular
practice of mass-stimulated
abdominal exercise,
women may acquire
similar results
to that of weight
training without
much difficulty
and through activating
the energy metabolism
process, a muscular
improvement as well
as fat metabolism
activation may be
expected. Although
there have been
no preceding researches
on weight loss or
natural appetite
loss by stimulating
abdominal muscles,
it is hoped that
through this research
of constructive
weight-loss program,
the effects of this
abdominal mass-stimulation
exerciser and the
reason for the changes
in middle age women¡¯s
size and body composition
be investigated.
|
|

|
|
¥±.
Research Methods
1.
Subject of Research For
this research, 60
volunteer women
inhabiting in B
city, between the
ages of 35-45, either
with 25% or more,
with a .85, or more
WHR participated
in this research.
Except for the exceptional
few with specific
circumstances, the
53 remaining volunteers
were split up into
3 different groups
to test Misie at
three different
weights: Groups
A (15 people) with
6 Kg, Group B (13
people) with 6.5
Kg, and Group C
(13 people) with
7Kg.
These participants,
who had not previously
participated in
a weigh-loss program,
are presently healthy
and in good condition.
Their physical characteristics
are as shown below
in <Table 1>.
|
|
Table
1. The
physical
characteristics
of subjects
|
|
group
|
N
|
age(yrs)
|
height(§¯)
|
weight(§¸)
|
%fat(%)
|
BMI(§¸/§³)
|
waist(§¯)
|
hip(§¯)
|
WHR(%)
|
|
A
|
15
|
41.07±3.55
|
160.29±6.35
|
69.11±8.48
|
35.10±4.94
|
26.56±2.41
|
90.91±8.09
|
99.17±5.08
|
0.90±0.06
|
|
B
|
13
|
41.46±4.58
|
157.88±5.93
|
63.69±7.06
|
32.12±4.02
|
26.11±2.24
|
86.55±6.31
|
96.47±3.84
|
0.89±0.04
|
|
C
|
13
|
41.69±4.19
|
160.37±3.95
|
68.25±7.27
|
32.58±3.81
|
27.18±3.54
|
90.12±4.97
|
98.06±3.92
|
0.89±0.04
|
|
D
|
12
|
41.50±4.98
|
159.73±4.89
|
66.80±7.40
|
32.00±3.89
|
25.74±2.02
|
90.31±8.09
|
97.95±3.81
|
0.90±0.04
|
|
|
|

|
|
2.
Areas and tools
of Measurement For
body size, height,
weight, waist, hip,
and WHR (%) were
measured; and for
body composition,
fat%(%), BMI, and
body fat(kg) were
measured. The tools
used are as listed
below in <Table
2>
|
|
Table
2. Test
items
and
measurement
tools
|
|
test
items
|
manufacture
and
model
|
|
height?weight
|
Fanics
HM-200:
Korea
|
|
waist
and
hip
circumference
|
tape:
samhwa
|
|
body
composition
|
In
Body
2.0
|
|
|
|

|
|
3.
Methods of measurement 1)
Body Size For
height(cm) and weight
(kg), an automatic
height and weight
measurer (Fanics
HM-200, Korea) was
used and the results
rounded up to the
nearest tenth. For
waist and hip measurements,
a measuring tape
(Sanhwa, Korea),
was used and the
results likewise
rounded to the nearest
tenth; the WHR was
calculated through
a formula using
the waist and hip
measurements.
2) Body Composition Body
Composition Analyzer,
a product of Biospace,
using multi-frequency
biolelectricity
impedance analytical
concept caused by
electrical resistance,
was used to measure
%fat (%), lean body
mass (kg), and body
fat(kg). In Body
2.0 has the functions
to analyze the dispersion
of body liquid,
number of body cells,
edema diagnosis
etc., high degree
of body composition
through the multi-frequency
8-point Tactile
Electrode System.
Once the subject
has stepped up on
the impedance measuring
device, hands holding
the electrode and
feet placed on the
electrode, the device
will make the measurement
within only 2 minutes
by measuring the
electricity resistance
from right arm,
left arm, right
leg, and left leg,
by pressing the
start button and
activating the micro
processor.
4.
Exercise Program 1)
Exercising methods
and tools. Using
group exercised
with ¡®Misie¡¯ in
a lying-down position
for 50 minutes by
regularly breathing,
stretching both
before and after
the exercise; comparison
group continued
to participate in
their everday routine.
The Misie that was
used for this research
is belt-like device
of 6-7kg, which
through naturally
breathing with the
device placed on
one¡¯s stomach stimulates
the abdominal area
with the weight.
Misie composes of
nickel special magnet,
magnetic weight,
stone-like massage
heating petal, pressure
dispersion petal,
germanium semiconductor
(Fig. 1)
|
|

|
|
(Fig. 1. Misie
Product)
|
|
2) Intensity
of exercises and
standards for determining
Misie¡¯s weight The
3 trial preparation
research to determine
the appropriate
weight of Misie
was conducted with
45 senior students
in a public high
school of B city.
The participants
were divided into
three groups 15
according to their
BMI, 23¢¦26, 27¢¦32,
32(kg/§³). Through
all 3 trials, starting
with 5.0kg and adding
extra 1 kg the consecutive
2 trials, none of
groups felt pains
or uncomfortable
lying with the 6.0kg
and 7.0kg mass on
their stomach for
50 minutes. Thus,
the research ended
with the conclusion
that 6.0~7.0kg of
weight a safe measurement;
and taking account
the different effects
of different weights,
it was decided to
have 3 different
weights of 6.0,
6.5, and 7.0 kg.
3) Length,
frequency, and period
of exercise The
duration of each
exercise session
consisted of 5 minutes
of warming up, 50
minutes of Misie
exercise, and 5
minutes of cooling
down. The regular
sessions were held
on Monday, Wednesday,
and Friday, 3days/week;
they were also assigned
to exercise Tuesday,
Thursday, and Saturday
3 days/week at home,
for altogether 8
weeks of duration.
Although the regular
sessions were clearly
regulated and checked
up on, the assigned
exercises were not
regulated but left
free for the exercisers
to decide on. The
8 weeks of exercise
programs are as
listed in <Table
3>
|
|
Table
3. Misie
training
program
for
8 weeks
|
|
order
|
contents
|
|
warm-up(5min)
|
stretching
|
|
main
exercise(50min)
|
exercise
battery
|
intensity
|
frequency
|
rest
|
|
exercise
with
Misie
on
the
abdominal
|
Misie
weightA
group
;
6.0kgB
group
;
6.5kgC
group
;
7.0kg
|
6times/week(home;
3times/week)
|
no
rest
|
|
cool-down(5min)
|
stretching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Statistic Disposition For
data interpretation,
the average and
standard deviations
for the measurements
were calculated
using SPSS ver 10.0.
Group average for
before and after
the experiment was
compared using one-way
ANOVA, comparisons
within the group
were calculated
using paired t-test,
and Schffe was used
verification of
the results. Significant
number was set to
¥á=.05
|
|

|
|
¥².
Research Results
1.
Body Size The
changes that occurred
in body size, such
as height, weight,
waist, hip, and
WHR are as listed
in <Table 4>.
1) height(cm) In
comparing the height
data taken before
and after the experiment,
there were no noticeable
changes in all group
A¢¦D.
2) weight(kg) In
comparing the weight
data taken before
and after the experiment,
group A showed a
decrease of 0.53kg,
however insignificant,
group B of 3.36kg
and group C of 2.62kg¡¯s
significant decrease
in mass (p<.001,
p<.05). Group
D, however, showed
a significant increase
of 2.47kg (p<.001).
There had been no
distinctions between
the groups prior
to the experiments
in weight difference;
after the experiment,
however, there were
distinct changes
(p<.05) between
the groups. After
identifying the
results, group D
had a larger average
than A?B?C, and
group A?C had larger
average than group
B.
3) Waist(§¯) Comparing
the waist measurements
before and after
the experiment,
groups A, B, and
C showed a significant
decrease of 1.88cm,
4.09cm, 4.53cm each
(p<.01, p<.001);
group D, however,
showed an increase
of 1.62cm (p<.05).
In the group comparison,
there were no significant
differences before
the experiment;
after the experiment,
there were significant
differences between
the groups (p<.01),
group D was higher
than A?B?C, and
group A?C was higher
than B.
4) Hip(§¯) Comparing
the hip measurement
before and after
the experiment,
group A?B?C showed
a significant decrease
of 1.23cm, 3.26cm,
2.81cm each(p<.01,
p<.001), but
group D showed an
increase of 1.75cm
( p<.001). In
the group comparison,
there were no significant
differences before
the experiment;
after the experiment,
there were significant
differences between
the groups (p<.01),
group D was higher
than A?B?C, and
group A?C was higher
than B.
5) WHR(%)
In comparing
the before and after
results of WHR,
group A decreased
by 0.01%, group
B and C showed a
significant decrease
of 0.05%, 0.03%
(p<.01, p<.001),
but group D showed
a significant increase
of 0.02%(p<.05).
In the group comparison,
there were no significant
differences before
the experiment;
after the experiment,
there were significant
differences between
the groups (p<.01),
group D was higher
than A?B?C, and
group A?C was higher
than B
|
|
Table
4. The
comparison
of physique
|
|
|
|
pre
|
post
|
diff
|
paired
t-value
|
|
height(cm)
|
group
A
|
160.29±6.35
|
160.62±6.57
|
.33
|
1.293
|
|
group
B
|
157.88±5.93
|
157.40±7.41
|
-.48
|
-1.464
|
|
group
C
|
160.37±3.95
|
160.22±3.89
|
-.15
|
-.966
|
|
group
D
|
159.73±4.89
|
159.83±4.82
|
.10
|
1.143
|
|
F-value
|
.610
|
1.718
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
|
|
weight(kg)
|
group
A
|
69.11±8.48
|
68.58±7.51
|
-.53
|
-1.052
|
|
group
B
|
63.69±7.06
|
60.33±6.89
|
-3.36
|
-5.637***
|
|
group
C
|
68.25±7.27
|
65.63±7.35
|
-2.62
|
-3.495**
|
|
group
D
|
66.80±7.40
|
69.27±7.80
|
2.47
|
5.578***
|
|
F-value
|
1.323
|
3.938*
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
C>B
|
|
|
|
waist(§¯)
|
group
A
|
90.91±8.09
|
89.03±7.92
|
-1.88
|
-4.017**
|
|
group
B
|
86.55±6.31
|
82.46±5.65
|
-4.09
|
-4.262**
|
|
group
C
|
90.12±4.97
|
85.59±5.23
|
-4.53
|
-6.087***
|
|
group
D
|
90.31±8.09
|
91.93±8.94
|
1.62
|
2.325*
|
|
F-value
|
1.055
|
4.26**
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
C>B
|
|
|
|
hip(§¯)
|
group
A
|
99.17±5.08
|
97.94±4.80
|
-1.23
|
-4.190**
|
|
group
B
|
96.47±3.84
|
93.21±3.75
|
-3.26
|
-4.714**
|
|
group
C
|
98.06±3.92
|
95.25±4.44
|
-2.81
|
-3.388**
|
|
group
D
|
97.95±3.81
|
99.70±4.17
|
1.75
|
4.884***
|
|
F-value
|
.946
|
5.592**
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
C>B
|
|
|
|
WHR(%)
|
group
A
|
0.90±0.06
|
0.89±0.05
|
-.01
|
-1.859
|
|
group
B
|
0.89±0.04
|
0.84±0.03
|
-.05
|
-5.623***
|
|
group
C
|
0.89±0.04
|
0.86±0.04
|
-.03
|
-4.482**
|
|
group
D
|
0.90±0.04
|
0.92±0.05
|
.02
|
2.275*
|
|
F-value
|
.220
|
8.393***
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
C>B
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
2.
Body Composition The
changes in body
composition¡¯s %fat,
fat, and LBM are
as listed in <Table
5>.
1) %fat(%) In
the comparison of
%fat before and
after group A?B?C
showed a significant
(p<.01) decrease
of 1.06%,
1.95%, 3.14% each,
but group D showed
a significant (p<.01)
increase of 3.00%.
In the group comparison,
there were no significant
differences before
the experiment;
after the experiment,
there were significant
differences between
the groups (p<.01),
group D was higher
than A?B?C, and
group A?B was higher
than C.
2) fat(kg) In
the comparison of
%fat before and
after group A?B?C
showed a significant
(p<.01, p<.001)
decrease of 0.91kg,
2.89kg, 2.20kg each,
but group D showed
an increase of 1.15kg,
however, nothing
significant. In
the group comparison,
there were no significant
differences before
the experiment;
after the experiment,
there were significant
differences between
the groups (p<.01),
group D was higher
than A?B?C, and
group A?C was higher
than B.
3) LBM(kg) In
the comparison of
%fat before and
after group A?B?C
showed a significant
(p<.05, p<.01)
increase of 0.50kg,
1.24kg, 1.19kgÀÇ
each, but group
D showed an decrease
of 0.47kg, however,
nothing significant.
There were no noticeable
differences in the
group comparison
either.
|
|
Table
5. The
comparison
of body
composition
|
|
|
|
pre
|
post
|
diff.
|
paired
t-value
|
|
%fat(%)
|
group
A
|
35.10±4.94
|
34.04±4.35
|
-1.06
|
-3.685**
|
|
group
B
|
32.12±6.76
|
30.17±2.41
|
-1.95
|
-4.869**
|
|
group
C
|
32.58±3.81
|
29.44±3.18
|
-3.14
|
-3.985**
|
|
group
D
|
32.00±10.36
|
35.00±4.48
|
3.00
|
3.925**
|
|
F-value
|
.658
|
7.187**
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
B>C
|
|
|
|
fat(kg)
|
group
A
|
24.18±5.60
|
23.27±4.99
|
-.91
|
-3.518**
|
|
group
B
|
21.93±3.10
|
19.04±3.08
|
-2.89
|
-5.534***
|
|
group
C
|
22.40±4.52
|
20.20±3.93
|
-2.20
|
-5.945***
|
|
group
D
|
23.03±4.77
|
24.18±5.06
|
1.15
|
.912
|
|
F-value
|
.626
|
4.089*
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
D>A
C>B
|
|
|
|
LBM(kg)
|
group
A
|
44.85±4.38
|
45.35±4.22
|
.50
|
2.758*
|
|
group
B
|
41.56±4.77
|
42.80±4.50
|
1.24
|
4.346**
|
|
group
C
|
45.65±3.69
|
46.84±3.77
|
1.19
|
4.638**
|
|
group
D
|
43.50±4.89
|
43.03±4.50
|
-.47
|
-.410
|
|
F-value
|
2.134
|
2.682
|
|
|
|
Post-doc(Schffe)
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
¥³.
Discussion
Whether
one is an athelete
or a middle age
housewife, the necessity
or the urge to lose
weight for healthier
weight maintenance
resides in them.
Despite the statistic
of 38¢¦40% of women
who attempt dieting,
the high failing
percentage has made
dieting a serious
social issue (Serdula
etc, 1993; Horm
& Anderson,
1993). The decrease
of muscle mass and
increase of fat
in middle age women
have negative effects
on the human¡¯s
overall natural
functions. It also
shows clear relations
with the cause of
deterioration of
natural functions,
related to aging,
such as decrease
in metabolism, decrease
in oxygen usability,
increase of blood
glucose density,
fat in the blood
stream, and increase
of cholesterol density,
high blood pressure
and decrease in
marrow density (K.Kim
& Y.C. Yoo,
1998). With such
knowledge, the necessity
of weight-care is
emphasized more
for its health-related
reasons than for
beauty. Middle age
women may exercise
by walking, running,
hiking, mechanic
exercise, free gymnastics,
aerobic, and swimming
(J.S. Park, 1999).
Most of these exercises,
however, may be
limited by the availability
of time, space,
or facilities; and
it is often hard
to pick the right
type of exercise
for a specific body
shape or age. An
exercising program
appropriate for
that age group with
appropriate intensity
and frequency is
thus needed (K.S.
Hyun, 2001).
This research
was conducted to
study the effectiveness
of Misie, which
may serve to be
the solution to
the physically and
environmentally
limiting reality
of today¡¯s middle
age women and in
hopes to find a
weight-loss programs
that does not require
excessive time or
financial usage.
1.
Body Size
No changes
in the body size
resulted from the
experiment but a
significant decrease
in weight and WHR
in all except for
group A, and a consensually
significant decrease
in waist and hip
size occurred in
all three groups.
Change
in weights occur
later in the exercise,
and becomes the
overall characteristic
of body development
depending on the
lifestyle, especially
nutritional intake.
Weight is a mass
composed of bones,
muscle, fat, blood,
and organs; and
it can be distinguished
between lean body
massfat mass.
Measuring
the WHR, hip and
waist size is an
efficient method
to measuring fat
mass dispersion
or abdomen obesity
(Ducimetier, Richard
& Cambien, 1989;
Bjorntorp, 1988;
NHLBI, 1998). The
methods of measuring
WHR is simple, however,
difficult to research
because the exact
location of measurement
is not standardized,
and does not accurately
measure internal
and subcutaneous
fat. In most cases,
when a woman¡¯s
waist size exceeds
88cm(>35in),
the danger of high-blood
pressure, cardiac
disorder, and diabetes
increase. The danger
of such disease
in people with low
BMI but with an
abdominal obesity
are also greater
than those with
similar BMI but
a smaller waist
size.
Although
the precise mechanism
in internal abdominal
fat that lead to
high a fat of blood
level, glucose,
and insulin, Reaven¡¯s(1994)
theory about internal
fat, which states
that it increases
the destructibility
of Catecholamine(Epinephirine
& Nor-epinephirine)
more than subcutaneous
fat and it can easily
cause blood to release
free fatty acids,
danger of excessive
abdominal fat may
be assumed.
The Misie
that was used for
this research is
belt-like device
of 6-7kg, which
helps reduce appetite
and lose weight
through mass stimulation
around the abdominal
area through naturally
breathing with the
device placed on
one¡¯s stomach.
This method of 50mins/
session for 6 sessions/week
weight exercise
was derived from
natural abdominal
respiration; abdominal
respiration is a
type of diaphragmatic
breathing and has
similar effects
of hypogastric breathing
because of the diaphragm¡¯s
tight contraction.
(S.J. Yoo &
M.S. Song, 2001).
The positive results
that have outcome
from this research
in regards to body
size, such as weight,
waist and hip size,
and WHR is similar
to that of Y.S.
Yoon(2001), an abdominal
respiration program
done for management
of abdominal obesity
of middle age women,
which also resulted
in significant decrease
in weight, waist,
and hip size. Also
comparing 2,600¢¦3,400g
of weight loss that
group B and C experienced
over the course
of 8 weeks to the
encouraged maximum
grams of weight
loss per week in
a diet program conducted
without a doctor
is approximately
500¢¦900g, suggests
the safe weight-loss
that Misie program
provides. Comparing
the WHR data, the
decrease from 0.89,
a level indicating
obesity, to 0.84¢¦0.85
in group B and C
prove the effects
of the Misie program;
however, seeing
how there were no
difference in group
A, exercising with
a 6.0Kg weight,
it must have not
been a critical
weight burden on
the decrease of
WHR. It is also
assumed that the
weight-pressure
of Misie stimulated
the abdominal muscles
to have brought
on the effects of
resistance exercise,
the positive effects
of which are widely
known today (O`Hagan,
1995; Faigenbaum,
2000; Pollock &
Evans, 1999; Layne
& Nelson, 1999;
McCartney, 1998;
S.G. Park et al.,
2001; K.J. Kim &
W.K. Chun, 1999;
K.O. Lee et al.,
2001).
There were
significant differences
in the group comparison.
Comparison group
(group D)¡¯s results
were higher than
group A (6.0kg),
group C(7.0kg),
and group B(6.5kg).
Group A and C¡¯s
results were higher
than that of group
B; this seems to
have resulted from
the effective weight-burden
of 6.5 Kg compared
to the lighter (6.0
kg) and the heavier
(7.0Kg). Thus, a
mass of 6.5-7.0kg
seems appropriate
for the weight of
Misie.
2.
Body Composition
Body composition
is an effective
way to measure one¡¯s
healthiness, such
as an excessively
high or low total
body fat level indicating
potential health-risks.
Although the multiple
of methods used
for measuring body
composition have
its strengths and
weaknesses, they
all serve as a prognosis
to diseases and
suggest a healthy
standard and exercises
that will help achieve
that standard.
%fat, fat,
and LBM were the
three categories
of measurement for
this research, and
in all 3 categories,
all groups A, B,
and C showed positive
results after the
program. The significant
decrease in %fat
and fat and increase
in LBM is assumed
that the resistance
exercise together
with abdominal respiration
improved cumulatively
to Misie program¡¯s
weight-loss effects.
The positive effects
that resistance
exercise has on
middle age women¡¯s
%fat, fat, and LBM
have been proven
through S.L. Jung
and B.R. Kim¡¯s
(2003) study of
middle age women
with more than 30%
fat %, which after
12 weeks of resistance
and composite exercises,
there was a reduction
in fat %. Eriksson
et al.(1999) said
that the fat % decreased
after 12 weeks in
a muscle resistance
training done to
a group of middle
age obese(II) diabetes
patients; Y.C. Kwon
et al.(2002) reported
a decrease in fat
% and increase in
LBM after conducting
a muscle resistance
training on a group
of middle age obese
women (age 40-45)
with more than 30%
fat %. J.H. Park
et al.¡¯s (2000)
resistance training
on 8 middle age
women also resulted
in an increase of
LBM, and Kraemer¡¯s(1998)
resistance exercise
augments testosterone,
growth hormones,
which in turn increase
the protein composition,
muscle development,
and lean body fat;
Vivian (2002) also
reports that resistance
exercise is effect
in decreasing fat
% and amount of
lean body fat in
both men and women.
Other reports such
as C.I. Lee (2002),
S.G. Park et al
(2001), and K.J.
Kim & W.K. Chun
(1999) also report
the positive effects
resistance exercise
has on fat % and
fat decrease. Although
the abdominal weight
Misie does not require
as intense or variety
of muscle usage
as weight training,
a representative
resistance exercise,
a persistent exercise
of 50 minutes/day
over a course of
8 weeks of exercise
with a 6kg weight
seem to have a tremendous
impact on the abdominal
decreasing fat %
and fat and increasing
LBM.
In most
cases, weight-loss
programs objective
is to maintain or
increase the ratio
of LBM or muscle
formation and in
turn improve health
by decreasing fat
%. Thus if LBM increases
or sustains during
weight-loss, regular
metabolism rate
is also increased
and fat metabolism
becomes activated.
For women¡¯s most
typical obesity,
gynoid shape abdominal
obesity (Heyward,
2002), which puts
pressure on the
joints and lead
to a varix bone
arthritis, Misie
program should avoid
vigorous physical
activity but take
an alternative approach
of limiting energy
intake.
Misie program
has also proven
to show similar
effects of fat %
reduction due to
respiratory exercises
because its consistent
weight burden on
the abdomen helps
the respiratory
system by increasing
the inhaling and
exhaling quantity,
and the ventilation
ability and oxygen
usability. K.S.
Hyun¡¯s (2001) on
middle-age obese
women who practiced
abdominal respiration
over the course
of 12 weeks, which
showed a decrease
in fat %, also affirm
to the similar effects
of abdominal respiration
that have resulted
from this research.
And although not
statiscally included
in this research,
common responses
to the program gathered
through one-on-one
interview were ¡°I
no longer had difficulties
with constipation;
my appetite decrease;
my body has become
lighter; my abdominal
strength has fortified,¡±
in that specific
order. Seeing how
appetite decrease
and cure of constipation
were the most common
subjective outcome,
these factors have
also contributed
to the subject¡¯s
decrease of fat
and fat %.
In the group
comparison, there
was no significant
difference in LBM;
however, a significant
difference in fat
% and fat. Group
D (Comparison group)
had a higher fat
% than group A of
6.0kg, group C of
7.0kg, and of 6.5kg
than group B. Group
A and B had a higher
fat % than group
C. Group D (Comparison
group) also had
a larger amount
of fat than groups
A,B, and C; group
A and C had more
fat than group B.
Such results proved
outstanding in the
loss of fat %, with
group B¡¯s weight,
6.5kg, yield the
most effective results;
this showed that
the higher the weight-pressure,
the more effective
was the fat loss.
Although the mechanism
to decrease in fat
% and fat in the
areas of measurement
is hard to verify
due to lack of precedent
researches, the
effects of abdominal
exercise, Misie
program seem are
clearly varified.
Misie is
considered as one
of the many dieting
machines marketed
today; most of these
fad diets, however,
are based on temporary
success, fame, and
marketing trickery.
Obesity patients
are prone to being
tricked into these
fad diets for their
strong desire to
find a product that
requires minimal
effort on their
part. They promote
their products by
hiring famous people,
in attempt to provide
credibility; such
claims made by these
dieting products
are illegitimate,
unproven by science
or biochemistry
(Manore & Thompon,
2000).
The claims
of fast fat and
weight loss made
by these fad-diet
advertisements are
far from the effects
of Misie; their
claims of weight-loss
without any or little
physical exercise
have neither the
credibility nor
evidence of proof.
Misie does
not have the quick
or vast change that
fad-dieting machines
or substances; its
effects are long-term,
however, making
it possible for
an effective weight-control,
and lay the basis
for furthermore
exercise programs
for a healthy body
composition. Acknowledging
its appropriate
conditions for middle
age women, without
putting an excessive
pressure on the
body, yet economical,
it seems that based
on body weight¡¯s
long-haul concept
(Williams, 2002),
a desirable weight
loss through exercise
will be accomplishable.
|
|

|
|
¥´.
Conclusion and Suggestion
Based on
the Misie program
that was conducted
on 53 women between
the age of 35-45,
60 mins/day for
6 weeks (3times
at home) for a total
of 8 weeks- group
A testing with Misie
of 6.0kg (N=15)
group B with 6.5kg(N=13),
group C with 7.0kg(N=13),
and group D with
(N=12) as the Comparison
group -conclusions
on the after effects
based on results
from the experiment
are as below.
1.
Body Size
1) Body Size/Body
Mass No changes
in body size occurred
within or between
the groups; however,
both groups B and
C showed a positive
decrease of body
mass. Between the
groups, group B
experienced more
loss than group
A, C, and D and
group A and C than
group
2) Waist/Hip
Size Groups
A, B, and C all
experienced positive
decrease in hip
and waist size.
Between the groups,
group B experienced
more decrease in
size than group
A, C, and D and
group A and C more
than Group D.
3) WHR Groups
B and C showed positive
WHR decrease. Group
B, however, experienced
a larger decrease
than group A,C,
and D and group
A and C more than
Group D.
2.
Body Composition
1) %fat Groups
A, B, and C all
experienced positive
decrease of fat
% after the exercise
program. Group C,
however, experienced
a larger decrease
than Group A, B,
and D and group
A and B more than
Group D.
2) fat Groups
A, B, and C all
showed positive
fat loss after the
exercise program.
Between the groups,
Group B showed more
loss than group
A, C, and D; and
Group A and C more
than Group D.
3) LBM Groups
A, B, and C all
showed positive
increase of LBM
but there were no
differences between
the different groups.
Based on
the results and
conclusions above,
the exercise product
Misie showed a positive
primary approach
to cure of obesity
in middle age housewives
who are unable to
participate in regualar
exercise programs.
It is also a pertinent
program to creating
a healthy body size
and appropriate
body mass. A secondary
experiment of the
program over an
extended period
of 12 weeks will
surely bring a much
more positive result
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|